Lacking the things that made the Joker actually the Joker, and not just another crazy murderer. But as a movie about the Joker I felt it was lacking. In conclusion, I can identify with the character which gave me a lasting impression of the movie, and this movie could have been very great if it was a movie about how a person that's rejected by society turns slowly into a serial killer. Even if taken into account that the poverty and anger was cooking for a long time in that society, it still feels somewhat absurd that killing three people in the subway made the joker so notorious. He didn't have the master mind that so much designated the Joker and made him different from a simple murderer.Īnother thing is that there were long parts of the movie that felt very dull.Īlso I found it hard to buy the reason behind the riots in the city and the role the Joker played in them. Not that much different from many other serial killers or mass murderers. He felt more like a simply society reject that went completely crazy and started killing people. What doesn't have anything with expectations is that at the end he didn't remind much of the original Joker. Could it be that I was expecting too much? Very possible since I came with very high expectations after reading some reviews. No deep psychological analysis, or a web of many deep factors that created a one of a kind psychotic maniac. There wasn't anything too complex about Arthur's mental state. Gotta hand it to the script writer - the plot was unpredictable. It was also very interesting to watch how he deteriorated mentally and little by little gave up on trying to fit into society. I really think it's a role only few could do. He managed to portray very believably the awkward social reject and also the crazy murderer that he became. There is no doubt that the movie was well thought of - from the plot to execution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |